Overview

Click to expand overview
The theory is that Berkshire might soon surpass MicroStrategy in Bitcoin holdings, with billions being deployed into the cryptocurrency. With Berkshire’s cautious Had Buffett allocated only 2% of Berkshire’s $57.9 billion to bitcoin in May 2025, instead of calling it rat poison squared, the firm might’ve bought up to about 137,000 Bitcoin is now valued at just under 6% less than Berkshire Hathaway, the conglomerate holding company headed by prominent BTC critic Warren Buffett. Bitcoin (BTC) Berkshire Hathaway superó al S&P 500 en 2025, apoyándose en Apple, Coca-Cola y 300.000 millones de dólares en cash. Bitcoin alcanzó un máximo histórico de Warren Buffett ha criticado consistentemente a Bitcoin, llamándolo famosamente veneno para ratas al cuadrado y declarando que no compraría todo el Bitcoin The Berkshire-Bitcoin connection validates cryptocurrency’s institutionalization while exposing generational divides in finance. Younger investors see 1 de sept. de 2025 Si una persona hubiera invertido USD 1,000 en Bitcoin (al contado) e iniciado una posición larga apalancada en las acciones de Berkshire Hathaway a principios de

70 vs. 500: Did Warren Buffett\'s Berkshire Underperform Bitcoin? The Great Debate

For years, the clash between traditional finance and the burgeoning world of cryptocurrency has been personified by the stark contrast between Warren Buffett and Bitcoin. Buffett, a staunch critic of Bitcoin, famously called it "rat poison squared." But did his Berkshire Hathaway\'s conservative strategy actually underperform Bitcoin, particularly considering the significant shifts observed around 2025?

Bitcoin\'s Surge vs. Berkshire\'s Growth

The performance comparison is striking. Bitcoin reached an all-time high in 2025, driven by increasing institutional acceptance and a growing understanding of its potential. Conversely, while Berkshire Hathaway superó al S&P 500 en 2025, apoyándose en Apple, Coca-Cola y 300.000 millones de dólares en cash. This raises the question: could Berkshire have seen even *greater* returns by strategically incorporating Bitcoin into its portfolio?

The "What If" Scenario: Berkshire and Bitcoin

Imagine this: Had Buffett allocated only 2% of Berkshire’s $57.9 billion to bitcoin in May 2025, instead of calling it rat poison squared, the firm might’ve bought up to about 137,000 Bitcoin. Bitcoin is now valued at just under 6% less than Berkshire Hathaway. The potential gains could have been substantial, significantly boosting Berkshire\'s overall performance.

The MicroStrategy Factor and Berkshire\'s Potential Entry

The theory is that Berkshire might soon surpass MicroStrategy in Bitcoin holdings, with billions being deployed into the cryptocurrency. With Berkshire’s cautious approach to investment, such a move would be a monumental shift and a clear signal of Bitcoin\'s growing acceptance within the traditional financial world.

Berkshire vs Bitcoin: A Leveraged Long Position

Consider this scenario: 1 de sept. de 2025 Si una persona hubiera invertido USD 1,000 en Bitcoin (al contado) e iniciado una posición larga apalancada en las acciones de Berkshire Hathaway a principios de the year, which strategy would have yielded the greater profit? The answer highlights the risk and reward dynamics of each investment.

Warren Buffett\'s Stance and Generational Divides

Warren Buffett has criticado consistentemente a Bitcoin, llamándolo famosamente veneno para ratas al cuadrado y declarando que no compraría todo el Bitcoin. The Berkshire-Bitcoin connection validates cryptocurrency’s institutionalization while exposing generational divides in finance. Younger investors see Bitcoin as a legitimate asset class, while more seasoned investors, like Buffett, remain skeptical.

The Future of Berkshire and Bitcoin

Ultimately, the comparison between Berkshire Hathaway and Bitcoin boils down to investment philosophy, risk tolerance, and a belief in future trends. While Berkshire\'s reliance on established companies like Apple and Coca-Cola provides stability, Bitcoin offers the potential for exponential growth. Only time will tell which strategy proves more successful in the long run.

Top Sources

Related Articles