Overview

Click to expand overview
1 de sept. de 2025 In the main body of the paper, I discuss various components of Bitcoin’s energy use, including the amount, composition, and geographical distribution of the energy, as It is a new digital tool that provides cutting-edge insights into the environmental footprint of blockchain networks other than Bitcoin, beginning with an in-depth For critics, Bitcoin’s thirst for energy is self-evidently badthe equivalent of pouring gasoline in a hole and setting it on fire. But for Bitcoin advocates, the network’s energy Proof of Stake related models uses significantly less energy when compared to their Proof of Work counterparts. Proponents In fact, the network consumed 1,738 kWh of electrical energy on average for every transaction processed on the blockchain. To contextualize, the same amount of electricity could power an average U.S. household for two months. According to the CCAF, Ethereum’s Figure 2Bitcoin and Ethereum PoW energy consumption compared to Ethereum PoS (from Digiconomist). This comparison is not to impose any value judgment on If Bitcoin’s energy consumption can be thought of as a skyscraper, Ethereum’s energy use post-Merge, would be the size of a raspberry, according to University If Bitcoin’s energy consumption can be thought of as a skyscraper, Ethereum’s energy use post-Merge, would be the size of a raspberry, according to Universit

Bitcoin Energy Consumption: Skyscraper vs. Ethereum's Raspberry & the Future of Blockchain

The debate around Bitcoin's energy use is a hot topic. For critics, Bitcoin’s thirst for energy is self-evidently bad – the equivalent of pouring gasoline in a hole and setting it on fire. But for Bitcoin advocates, the network’s energy consumption is a necessary component for its security and decentralization.

How much energy does Bitcoin use? 1 de sept. de 2025 In the main body of the paper, I discuss various components of Bitcoin’s energy use, including the amount, composition, and geographical distribution of the energy, as highlighted in recent research. In fact, the network consumed 1,738 kWh of electrical energy on average for every transaction processed on the blockchain. To contextualize, the same amount of electricity could power an average U.S. household for two months. This significant consumption has led to increased scrutiny and the search for more sustainable alternatives.

Ethereum's Energy Efficiency: A Game Changer?

The landscape dramatically shifted with Ethereum's transition to Proof of Stake (PoS). If Bitcoin’s energy consumption can be thought of as a skyscraper, Ethereum’s energy use post-Merge, would be the size of a raspberry, according to University researchers. If Bitcoin’s energy consumption can be thought of as a skyscraper, Ethereum’s energy use post-Merge, would be the size of a raspberry, according to Universit. According to the CCAF, Ethereum’s Figure 2 - Bitcoin and Ethereum PoW energy consumption compared to Ethereum PoS (from Digiconomist). This dramatic reduction is a key argument for the adoption of PoS mechanisms.

Proof of Stake related models uses significantly less energy when compared to their Proof of Work counterparts. Proponents of PoS emphasize this efficiency as a crucial advantage. It is a new digital tool that provides cutting-edge insights into the environmental footprint of blockchain networks other than Bitcoin, beginning with an in-depth analysis of Ethereum and its transition.

The Future of Sustainable Blockchain

This comparison is not to impose any value judgment on either blockchain but to highlight the stark differences in energy consumption. As blockchain technology evolves, the focus is increasingly on finding sustainable solutions. Continued research and innovation are essential to minimize the environmental impact of blockchain while maintaining its security and functionality. The future of blockchain depends on its ability to become environmentally responsible.

Top Sources

Related Articles