In the latest development of the FTX saga, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) has dismissed Sam Bankman-Fried’s (SBF) planned defense as “irrelevant.” A new court filing submitted late Monday underscores the DOJ's position. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has taken a new step in its ongoing case against Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), characterizing his proposed defense against fraud. The lawyers representing the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a new court document on Aug. 29 arguing that Sam “SBF” Bankman-Fried should provide additional information. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is intensifying its efforts to gather additional information from Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) as part of its ongoing investigation into.

The document called the current proposed argument, which claims his lawyers approved of fraud allegations while he was still at FTX, “irrelevant.” Specifically, the document called “irrelevant” the argument proposed, claiming his lawyers approved of fraud allegations while he was still at FTX. This legal maneuver signals a significant point of contention as SBF prepares his defense against numerous fraud charges.

El DOJ considera la defensa de fraude de SBF irrelevante y pide más información. Los abogados que representan al Departamento de Justicia de los Estados Unidos (DOJ) presentaron un. El documento calificaba de irrelevante el argumento propuesto actualmente, que afirma que sus abogados aprobaron las acusaciones de fraude cuando aún. The DOJ’s stance suggests it believes SBF's defense lacks merit and may be an attempt to deflect responsibility. This development could significantly impact the trajectory of the trial and the severity of potential penalties for SBF. Keep checking back for updates on this developing story.