Overview

Click to expand overview
I-Remit uses XRP and Ripple’s ODL for sending money to and from the Philippines. They have requested to file an amicus brief in support of Ripple, with their argument focusing on how they The SEC said on Tuesday that it opposed both motions from I-Remit, a global payment remittance firm, and TapJets, a private jet charter and aircraft management Defendants argue that SEC has mischaracterized amicus briefs proposed by TapJets Inc. and I-Remit Inc. Ripple has slammed the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for attempting In the document, I-Remit explains how it relies on RippleNet’s On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) service to seamlessly facilitate international transactions. According to the Defense Lawyer James K Filan, who has been a vital source in the SEC vs. Ripple lawsuit, has shared documents regarding I-Remit’s amicus brief in support of Ripple. In a recent development, U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres permitted I-Remit and TapJets, two third-party defendants, to submit Amicus Briefs on behalf of Ripple in the US Securities and Ripple has responded to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s opposition to amicus brief requests filed by TapJets and I-Remit in support of the blockchain Following the court’s ruling that denied SEC’s objections regarding Ripple partners’ motions, I-Remit has eventually submitted an amicus brief. During the late hours of

In a significant development in the ongoing SEC vs. Ripple lawsuit, I-Remit submits amicus brief despite SEC opposition, marking a win for Ripple and its supporters. Ripple has vehemently criticized the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for its attempts to block amicus brief requests, particularly those filed by TapJets and I-Remit.

I-Remit uses XRP and Ripple’s ODL for sending money to and from the Philippines. They have requested to file an amicus brief in support of Ripple, with their argument focusing on the practical impact of the SEC's claims on their business. According to the Defense Lawyer James K Filan, a crucial source in the SEC vs. Ripple case, documents related to I-Remit’s amicus brief have been shared, highlighting the importance of this development.

The SEC said on Tuesday that it opposed both motions from I-Remit, a global payment remittance firm, and TapJets, a private jet charter and aircraft management company, to file amicus briefs. Defendants argue that SEC has mischaracterized amicus briefs proposed by TapJets Inc. and I-Remit Inc., suggesting the SEC's opposition is based on a flawed understanding of their relevance. U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres, however, permitted I-Remit and TapJets, two third-party defendants, to submit Amicus Briefs on behalf of Ripple in the US Securities case.

The core of I-Remit's argument lies in its reliance on RippleNet's On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) service. In the document, I-Remit explains how it relies on RippleNet’s On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) service to seamlessly facilitate international transactions. This illustrates the real-world implications of the SEC's regulatory stance on XRP and its potential impact on businesses utilizing Ripple's technology.

Following the court’s ruling that denied SEC’s objections regarding Ripple partners’ motions, I-Remit has eventually submitted an amicus brief. During the late hours of [date], the brief was officially filed, solidifying I-Remit's support for Ripple and potentially influencing the judge's decision in the case.

Top Sources

Related Articles